Subdued Swells: Understanding The Absence Of A Women's March On Trump's Second Inauguration

Subdued Swells: Understanding The Absence Of A Women's March On Trump's Second Inauguration


Subdued Swells: Understanding the Absence of a Women’s March on Trump’s Second Inauguration

On January 20, 2017, the Women’s March on Washington took place, less than a day after Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 45th president of the United States. The march was a massive display of resistance to the new administration, with an estimated 5 million people participating in marches worldwide. However, on January 20, 2021, Trump’s second inauguration day, there was no comparable march.

Why the Absence of a March?

There are several reasons why there was no Women’s March on Trump’s second inauguration. First, the political landscape has shifted since 2017. Trump is no longer a new president, and the initial shock and anger that many felt after his election has subsided. Second, the #MeToo movement has raised awareness of sexual harassment and assault, and many women are now more focused on addressing this issue than on protesting Trump.

Third, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it difficult to organize large gatherings. In addition, some activists argued that a march would be counterproductive, as it could lead to violence or give Trump an opportunity to claim that he is a victim of unfair attacks.

Differing Perspectives

There are a variety of perspectives on the absence of a Women’s March on Trump’s second inauguration. Some activists believe that it is a sign of progress that the movement has moved beyond mass protests. Others argue that the absence of a march is a sign of complacency or apathy. Still others believe that the movement is simply taking a different form, and that it will continue to be a force for change in the United States.

See also  Theresa Nist Breaks Silence On Gerry Turner's Cancer

Implications for the Future

The absence of a Women’s March on Trump’s second inauguration does not mean that the women’s movement is dead. The movement is still alive and well, but it is evolving. The movement is now more focused on addressing issues such as sexual harassment, assault, and reproductive rights. It is also more inclusive, with a wider range of voices being heard. The movement is not going away, and it will continue to be a force for change in the United States.

Conclusion

The absence of a Women’s March on Trump’s second inauguration is a complex issue with no easy answers. There are a variety of factors that contributed to the decision not to hold a march, and there are a variety of perspectives on the implications of this decision. However, one thing is clear: the women’s movement is still alive and well. The movement is evolving, but it is not going away. It will continue to be a force for change in the United States.


Arsenal track former Real Madrid wonderkid for midfield boost
Image by www.sportingnews.com

Back To Top